Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:28

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Justin Bieber talks 'anger issues,' says he's 'broken' in emotional Instagram post - ABC News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Strike by Safeway, Albertsons workers to start Sunday in 4 Colorado cities - The Denver Post
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Retailers Seen Using Stablecoins to Push Back Against Card Fees - Bloomberg
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Tom Girardi Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison on His 86th Birthday - Vulture
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Toyota Ends Up Fastest in Night Practice - Sportscar365
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Nvidia Stock Lands a New Street-High Price Target - TipRanks